AUTHOR: Slublog DATE: 8/09/2004 09:00:00 AM ----- BODY: Kerry for FMA? - From Hugh Hewitt's site:
...this week Kerry told the Kansas City Star that he would have voted for the Missouri amendment that limited marriage to one man and one woman which passed overwhelmingly on Tuesday, 71% to 29%: "Kerry did say that he would have voted for Amendment 2, the constitutional amendment banning gay marriage that passed overwhelmingly Tuesday. He said that Massachusetts passed the same type of amendment a few years ago and that he supported it..."
Where's Andrew going to go now? I'm waiting for the bordering-on-ad-hom denunciation of John Kerry in the Daily Dish, or by the Human Rights Commission. Where are the press releases? Where is the outrage?!? I have a feeling I'll be waiting awhile. The absence of outrage suggests Kerry's supporters know exactly where the Senator stands on gay marriage, and feel confident enough to keep quiet about it. John Kerry is a supporter of gay marriage who doesn't want to admit it, lest he lose those votes down south and in the midwest. So instead of standing on principle, he'll lie about his views and make those who criticized Bush so angrily (paging Sully) look like hypocrites when they refuse to treat Kerry with the same ferocity. --------